Graphology: Handwriting Analysis and What I Can Do With It

I am a handwriting analyst. I can find out things about people that would otherwise have taken hours if not days of conversation in minutes just by looking at a few lines of their handwriting.

The traits I can find include:

Optimistic or pessimistic nature.

How much attention or fame the person wants.

Whether the person wants a lot of attention or not.

Whether the person is comfortable around social gatherings.

Whether the person is an over-thinker.

Greed or the lack of it.

Friendliness.

Aesthetic sense.

Patience or impatience.

High or low self expectations.

Whether they desire to distance from their friends..

Whether they criticize people easily.

If they have a fear of being abandoned.

The persons self image.

Being stuck in the past, present or future.

Strength of imagination.

Tendency to distraction.

If the person prioritizes communication and organization or not.

Whether or not the person likes to expend energy.

Whether the person is emotionally expressive or reserved or nervous.

Suicidality.

Hand tremors.

Openness to new methods and ideas. 

Stimulant dependence.

Past trauma.

 

I will not tell you exactly where I learned this phenomenal ability. It wasn't a single source for sure. All of the above traits are relative, subjective. When I say that a person is not an over-thinker, I mean to say that he or she is not that much into thinking too much about the abstract compared to most other people. Not that the person is not an over-thinker. 

I remember when I first analysed the handwriting of a girl that showed signs of less than normal abstract thinking. She claimed I was wrong, that she overthought a lot. I asked her, "so you spend like 90 minutes a day thinking?"

"No", she replied.

"Like an hour", I asked, she once again shook her head.

"Like half an hour a day", I asked.   

"Yeah", she answered.

I knew from experience, as I was already a well read observant person before starting handwriting analysis, that an hour to an hour and a half or 2 hours a day could be considered a normal amount of time thinking about the abstract, 30 minutes a day thinking, which she thought was a lot, was less compared to most people. Similar things ave happened with other observations. One 16 year old boy told me he was nervous when he wrote, and always lustful since his handwriting showed no signs of nervousness or lust, I correctly concluded that he was very good at hiding his lust and fear from others.

Yes, this method of analyzing a person is so powerful that it often tells things about a person that the person doesn't even know about themselves or is in denial of.  

Handwriting analysis can find the most traits with the greatest accuracy with long, autobiographical writing samples, on a blank sheet of paper with a known writing tool and surface. Lined paper, short writing samples, unknown writing tools, and samples that are dictated words from others will all reduce its usefulness and accuracy, and so will intentionally trying to make the handwriting look a certain way. It is harder to do the neater someones handwriting is. Even then, the sheer power of this analysis mean that many things cannot be easily hidden and will be found out. Of course, it is useless when the writing is written by someone else. 

Some people take the facts, that dictated words and intentional writing reduce its accuracy, and say that it is completely useless and fake because of this. I find this absurd, it is like saying that trains are useless because they cant run when derailed, or that cars are useless because hills slow them down. Not every useful theory needs to be exact, hard, no exceptions science like mathematics or physics to be useful. 

The other argument, that all graphologists will say different things. That does not make it inaccurate. In fact, that could actually mean that both observations are correct. It could in fact mean that graphology, handwriting analysis, is far more powerful than people realize.